Internet-Draft SCION DI July 2024
Meynell & Rustignoli Expires 9 January 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
Path Aware Networking RG
Internet-Draft:
draft-meynell-scion-deployment-latest
Published:
Intended Status:
Informational
Expires:
Authors:
K. Meynell
SCION Association
N. Rustignoli
SCION Association

SCION Deployment Issues

Abstract

TODO Abstract here

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

The latest revision of this draft can be found at https://scionassociation.github.io/scion-deployment_I-D/draft-meynell-scion-deployment.html. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meynell-scion-deployment/.

Discussion of this document takes place on the Path Aware Networking RG Research Group mailing list (mailto:panrg@irtf.org), which is archived at https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/panrg/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg/.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/scionassociation/scion-deployment_I-D.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 9 January 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

TODO Introduction

2. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Deployment Models

TODO Deployment Models

4. Establishing and running an Isolation Domain

TODO ISD

5. Establishing and running a SCION network

TODO Running a SCION network

6. Adding and removing networks from an Isolation Doman

TODO Adding and removing network from ISDs

7. Connecting to other Isolation Domains

TODO Connecting to other ISDs

8. SCION-IP Gateway Deployment

TODO SCION-IP Gateway Deployment

9. End Host Deployment

TODO End Host Deployment

10. Performance Monitoring

TODO Perforamcne Performance

11. Security Considerations

TODO Security

12. IANA Considerations

This document has no IANA actions.

13. Normative References

[I-D.scion-cp]
de Kater, C., Rustignoli, N., and S. Hitz, "SCION Control Plane", , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dekater-scion-controlplane/>.
[I-D.scion-cppki]
de Kater, C., Rustignoli, N., and S. Hitz, "SCION Control-Plane PKI", , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dekater-scion-pki/>.
[I-D.scion-dataplane]
de Kater, C., Rustignoli, N., and S. Hitz, "SCION Data Plane", , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dekater-scion-dataplane/>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

Acknowledgments

TODO acknowledge.

Authors' Addresses

Kevin Meynell
SCION Association
Nicola Rustignoli
SCION Association